Weened off the black mirror for the Digileak Newsletter. Still post a few things to Digileak on Bitchute. Spending most of the time gardening, reading at the ocean, riding my bike, seeing family and friends and getting what I need for when shortages come knocking at the door. Cheers, Kman, editor, DIGILEAK News Not Noise
> There’s a biological component to this. We are wired with a negative bias—a survival mechanism meant to alert us to danger. In its proper context, it keeps us alive. But in the modern environment, that same mechanism is constantly triggered, exploited, and amplified.
But if it is triggered on purpose, isn't what you call the wired-in negative bias quite appropriate, or in another perspective, not even so much a bias at all but often a *response* to very real threats?
Or, in other words, isn't *reacting* to the threats, being fearful or *directly* stressed and so forth by that what modern media present to us, the wrong reaction, but the "negative bias" on another level still very much appropriate, given that this happens and on a deeper level we should be very negative about the exploitation and triggering indeed?
I’d say that’s a semantics issue. Much like adjuvants are used to force an immune reaction to a weakened or dead pathogen, exposing yourself to stressors that have no real impact on your life causes an unwarranted and unhealthy reaction. I hope that is helpful. Thank you.
100% 1 .... 100 % true <3 thank you be love divine for your eXpression of the X variable you uniquely R the one beauty full real one that can only always invite the one to be the one one is already! boom diggity boom! <3
Weened off the black mirror for the Digileak Newsletter. Still post a few things to Digileak on Bitchute. Spending most of the time gardening, reading at the ocean, riding my bike, seeing family and friends and getting what I need for when shortages come knocking at the door. Cheers, Kman, editor, DIGILEAK News Not Noise
Sounds lovely. Blessings.
That was the best thing besides scripture I read this morning. Thank you, been thinking these things too and need to shut off.
Yup. Exactly.
I stumbled over this part:
> There’s a biological component to this. We are wired with a negative bias—a survival mechanism meant to alert us to danger. In its proper context, it keeps us alive. But in the modern environment, that same mechanism is constantly triggered, exploited, and amplified.
But if it is triggered on purpose, isn't what you call the wired-in negative bias quite appropriate, or in another perspective, not even so much a bias at all but often a *response* to very real threats?
Or, in other words, isn't *reacting* to the threats, being fearful or *directly* stressed and so forth by that what modern media present to us, the wrong reaction, but the "negative bias" on another level still very much appropriate, given that this happens and on a deeper level we should be very negative about the exploitation and triggering indeed?
I’d say that’s a semantics issue. Much like adjuvants are used to force an immune reaction to a weakened or dead pathogen, exposing yourself to stressors that have no real impact on your life causes an unwarranted and unhealthy reaction. I hope that is helpful. Thank you.
Fair points!
100% 1 .... 100 % true <3 thank you be love divine for your eXpression of the X variable you uniquely R the one beauty full real one that can only always invite the one to be the one one is already! boom diggity boom! <3